Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. implemnting a new Control Loop creation flow: Self Serve Control Loop .
  2. Add Tosca policy-model support for Operationnal Policies definbitions.
  3. Add integration to CDS for Actor/Action selection.
  4. Move from SearchGuard to OpenDistro
ScopePriorityCommitter LeadResources CommittedEpic Dependencies 
 CLAMP Self Serve Control Loop high AT&T, Ericscson
 

 

Jira Legacy
serverSystem Jira
columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
serverId4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176
keyCLAMP-514

 DCAE
CLAMP use policy model for Ops PolicyhighAT&T, Ericcsson

Jira Legacy
serverSystem Jira
columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
serverId4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176
keyCLAMP-492

Policy
CLAMP - CDS integrationhighvidyashree.ramaAT&T, Huawei

Jira Legacy
serverSystem Jira
columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
serverId4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176
keyCLAMP

-260 DCAE

-490

CDS
SearchGuard to OpenDistro movehighAT&T



Use Cases

The existing use cases are still going to be supported and additional use cases will be supported for the Frankfurt Release (as defined by the Control loop sub committee and TSC)

...

CLAMP is a platform for designing and managing control loops.  It is used to design setup a closed control loop, configure it with specific parameters for a particular network service, then deploying and undeploying it.  Once deployed, the user can also update the loop with new parameters during runtime, as well as suspending and restarting it.

It interacts with other systems to deploy and execute the closed loop.  For example, it pushes the control loop design to the SDC catalogreceives CSAR service package from SDC, associating it with the VF resource.  It requests from DCAE the instantiation of microservices to manage the closed loop flow.  Further, it creates and updates multiple policies in the Policy Engine that define the closed control loop flow.  

The ONAP CLAMP platform abstracts the details of these systems under the concept of a control loop model.  The design setup of a control loop and its management is represented by a workflow in which all relevant system interactions take place.  This is essential for a self-service model of creating and managing control loops, where no low-level user interaction with other components is required.

...

A Dashboard has been introduced to allow the user to get a quick overview of the status and events  of running control loops.

...

Deliverable NameDeliverable DescriptionDeliverable location
CLAMP Docker containerDocker images available on nexus3Nexus3 docker registry
Source Code

Code of the Designer and run time of CLAMP

CLAMP git repository
Deployment scriptsScripts that can be used to help with the container instantiation and configurationCLAMP git repository
Property FilesProperties files that can be used to tune the configuration of CLAMP depending on the environmentCLAMP git repository
DocumentationRelease specific documentation (Release Note, user guide, deployment guide) provided through readthedocsCLAMP git repositoryreadthedoc ONAP section : https://docs.onap.org/en/latest/index.html

Sub-Components

....

Architecture

...

  • Below we show how the CLAMP application fits into ONAP.  The red figure below shows the CLAMP application components.  There is a design portion and an operations component, which are both deployed within ONAP portal.

...




CLAMP is separated in 3 areas, which are currently (in seed code) both supported by a single application:

  1. Design/Setup Time(Cockpit/UI to Configure the received templates)
    1.  SDC will distribute a CSAR, for a service, the part of the CSAR that CLAMP will use are:
      1.   the Control Loop flow Templates(e.g: blueprint) are defined in DCAE-D(sub-component of SDC) and distributed to CLAMP by SDC. The templates format is TOSCA. The blueprint is also pushed, by SDC, to DCAE platform orchestration engine.
      2. The policy-models defining the DCAE µS used inside the blueprint. note that policy-engine will also receive this SDC distribution and so should be also aware of those policy-models.
    2. policies (configuration and operational policies) are pushed/provisioned towards the Policy Component of ONAP. (those policies will be triggered by DCAE during Closed Loop operations).
      1. The DCAE team needs to provide models to Policy team in order for the Configuration policy to be built. 
  2. Run time(DCAE-Policy, grabbing events and triggering policies based actions)
    1. the triggering to deploy(and then effectively start the closed loop)  a blueprint will be manual (via CLAMP cockpit) an automatic deployment based on an event will come in future release.
    2. The CLAMP cockpit will support the following action at runtime:
      1. start (start the provisioned Closed Loop on DCAE)
      2. stop (stop a provisioned Closed loop on DCAE)
  3. Dashboard (ELK based)
    1. CLAMP also provides (as a separate components) an ELK stack (with specific configurations for the elk components) that listen to Control Loop events published on DMAAP on specific dmaap topics. 

...

CLAMP-276CLAMP-83

CLAMP-102single site horizontal scaling


AreaActual levelTargeted level for current releaseHow, EvidencesComments
Performance0

0

(given CLAMP is design time there is no point to adhere to L2 requirement) 

Run performance basic test, depends on performance criteria availability for level 1 - not able to commit to more than what was done on Beijing
  • Level 0: no performance testing done
  • Level 1: baseline performance criteria identified and measured  (such as response time, transaction/message rate, latency, footprint, etc. to be defined on per component)
  • Level 2: performance improvement plan created 
  • Level 3: performance improvement plan implemented for 1 release (improvement measured for equivalent functionality & equivalent hardware)

minimum level for Dublin is 0 except for Control Loop projects. 


see Performance levels

Stability12Participate to Stability runs Level 1
Jira Legacy
serverSystem Jira
serverId4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176
key2

Participate to Stability runs Level 1



Integration Team is responsible to run the platform test to prove level 2.

  • Level 0: none beyond release requirements
  • Level 1: 72 hour component-level soak test (random test transactions with 80% code coverage; steady load)
  • Level 2: 72 hour platform-level soak test (random test transactions with 80% code coverage; steady load)
  • Level 3: track record over 6 months of reduced defect rate

minimum level for Dublin:2 

see Stability levels

Resiliency1

1

(given CLAMP is design time there is no point to adhere to L2 requirement) 

Jira Legacy
serverSystem Jira
serverId4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176
key


  • Level 0: no redundancy
  • Level 1: support manual failure detection & rerouting or recovery within a single site; tested to complete in 30 minutes
  • Level 2: support automated failure detection & rerouting 
    • within a single geographic site
    • stateless components: establish baseline measure of failed requests for a component failure within a site 
    • stateful components: establish baseline of data loss for a component failure within a site
  • Level 3: support automated failover detection & rerouting 

    • across multiple sites 

    • stateless components 

      • improve on # of failed requests for component failure within a site 

      • establish baseline for failed requests for site failure 

    • stateful components 

      • improve on data loss metrics for component failure within a site 

      • establish baseline for data loss for site failure


Minimum Levels (Dublin)

  • Runtime Projects: Level 2 (stretch goal Level 3)
    • NOTE: For Dublin, the building blocks will be put in place for Level 3 geo-redundancy, and a few projects will pilot it
  • All other Projects: Level 1 (stretch goal Level 2)

see Resiliency Levels 


Security11

same as in Casablanca, not enough resource to allocate to this effort.



see Security Levels

Scalability11

Level 1 single site horizontal scaling

Jira Legacy
serverSystem Jira
serverId4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176
key
  • Level 0: no ability to scale
  • Level 1: supports single site horizontal scale out and scale in, independent of other components
  • Level 2: supports geographic scaling, independent of other components
  • Level 3: support scaling (interoperability) across multiple ONAP instances

Minimum Levels (Dublin)

  • Runtime Projects: Level 1 
    • NOTE: For Dublin, the building blocks will be put in place for Level 2 geographic scaling, and a few projects will pilot it
  • All other Projects: Level 0 

see Scalability levels 

Manageability1

1

(2, if CLAMP can get more resource from the community)


  • Level 1:
    • All ONAP components will use a single logging system.
    • Instantiation of a simple ONAP system should be accomplished in <1 hour with a minimal footprint
  • Level 2:
    • A component can be independently upgraded without impacting operation interacting components
    • Component configuration to be externalized in a common fashion across ONAP projects
    • All application logging to adhere to ONAP Application Logging Specification v1.2
    • Implement guidelines for a minimal container footprint
  • Level 3
    • Transaction tracing across components

Minimum Levels (Dublin)

  • All Projects: Level 2
    • New projects should adhere to v1.2
    • Existing projects have stretch goal for v1.2
  • Stretch Goal: Level 3 
  • Note: some work will be done in Dublin to test/prep for a release upgrade strategy

see Manageability Levels 

Usability1

1

(2, if CLAMP can get more resource from the community)

CLAMP is not anticipating new API at this point, so we are technically compliant with API CVS at this point

  • Level 1:

      • User guide created
      • Deployment documentation
      • API documentation
      • Adherence to coding guidelines
  • Level 2:
  • Level 3
      • Consistent UI across ONAP projects
      • Usability testing conducted
      • API Documentation
  • Level 4

    Minimum Levels (Dublin)

    • All Projects: Level 2
    • Stretch Goal: External APIs also follow the Versioning Strategy


  • see Usability Levels

...

API NameAPI DescriptionAPI Definition DateAPI Delivery dateAPI Definition link (i.e.swagger)
Same as previous releaseAPI exposed by SDC to get list of Alarms and service information'sDate for which the API is reviewed and agreedAlready availableLink toward the detailed API description
Same as Casablancaprevious releaseSDC Client(jar library provided by SDC team) used to get service template (describing control loop flow) and blueprint id( to know which blueprint has been distributed to DCAE for this Control Loop template)
Already available
Same as previous release API exposed by Policy to create/update guard policies 
(used for scale out use case operational policies)
 ongoing
TBDAlready available
Same as previous releaseAPI exposed by Policy to create/update policies 
Already available

API exposed by policy to get a policy-model given the policy-model-idongoingTBD(new set of api based on policy-models)

API exposed by Policy to create polidy pdp groupongoingTBD
Same as Casablancaprevious releaseAPI exposed by DCAE to start/stop a Closed Loop
Already available
Same as Casablancaprevious releaseAPI exposed by DCAE to trigger the deployment/undeployment of a Control Loop template
Already available
Same as Casablancaprevious release API API exposed by DCAE to get status of a CLAMP deployed µS
Already available

  API API exposed by DCAE to get status of all µS ongoingongoing TBD

API exposed by DCAE to get the list of Control Loop Flow available to use by CLAMPongoingTBD

API exposed by CDS to retriev CDS actors/actionsongoingTBD

API Outgoing Dependencies

API this release of CLAMP is delivering to other ONAP Component(s) releases.

...

CLAMP will invest in CSIT tests to allow further integration testing, CLAMP already provided some tests as part of R1previous releases.

Gaps

This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.

...