...
| 2019 Modeling Subcommittee Recordings |
|---|
Duration 60 minutes
| Duration | Agenda Item | Requested by | Notes / Links |
|---|---|---|---|
START RECORDING: | |||
| 20 | Co-chair | ONAP R6 Modeling High Level Requirements Call for input by Aug 22 ONAP Frankfurt Release requirement input Frankfurt Release Requirements Reporting on the Frankfurt release to the TSC will begin Aug 22 Prioritize & Finalize: Sep. 1-23 M1: Sep. 23rd ACTION: call for review before next week call, M0 final review 2019 Antwerp Meeting Proposals Call for proposal; Modeling Subcommittee call during joint meeting | |
| 5 | Resource IM report | ONAP R6 Resource IM Call 2019-8-19 Any today use case need geolocation, P&P? yes? | |
| Papyrous | Kevin Scaggs | Papyrous good team between Kevin and Chuyi | |
| 5 | Service IM report | ONAP Service IM Minutes 20190814 Why maxAvailableNum is applied VES? Please join VES discussion tomorrow. | |
| 5 | DM report | ||
| 5 | RE for A&AI | ||
| 10 | Use case related | LIN MENG | CCVPN Use Case in Frankfurt Release 1. To provide the mapping relation between CFS and RFS. For example, one input parameter from customer may reflect on several configuration parameters of the resources. The customer faced inputs are very simple and easy to understand while the inputs of the resources are complicated and professional. 2. To support Nested service/ Composite service. the needs from our use case is that we want 2 services to be wrapped as a union to be provided to the customer. For example, A CCVPN service maybe an SOTN service, an SD-WAN service, or mix of both. Q1: whether we could achieve it by CFS composed by composite service hierarchical. Q2: whether mapping belongs to modeling subcommitee. CCVPN Contact : Chuyi |
| 20 | Allotted Resource Modeling | Kevin will present to resource model call next week. | |
...
ACTION ITEMS:
...
Zoom Chat Log
| View file | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|