Kickoff Materials/Background
- First presentation at ARCHCOM, 03/19
- Follow up presentation at ARCHCOM, 04/09
Meeting Information
Meetings when needed
Next meetings in week 18 to be called .
Agenda:
Discussion on ARCH Subcommittee jira Stories:
Jira Legacy | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
==============================
Objectives
- Enable use of CDS for self-service LCM operations currently supported by APPC and SDNC
Identify target architecture for LCM API consolidation across different controllers: APPC, SDNC including CDS
Identify migration path need
Identify ONAP recommendations in case of
- Supporting PNFs for applicable LCM operations
- How and where to describe standard actions/operations including input parameters in payload
Adding a new LCM operation
A new UC/sw contribution with current LCM operations
Frankfurt way forward
To Do's
-
Identify target architecture and recommended evolution for the Frankfurt (R6) release
-
Establish LCM API principles and recommendations
-
Conclude migration path need for APPC/SDNC
Identify component candidates for CCSDK
Target Architecture
SO/Policy communicate to GnfC using grpc via Self Service API.
Background - LCM workflows in Dublin
LCM workflows in SO are composed of activity building blocks. Many of the building blocks correspond to an LCM action towards controller (APPC/SDNC).
Frankfurt Step
Current best thinking for Frankfurt is to support multiple controller APIs by branching within SO based information in the distributed models (TOSCA/CSAR).
A more detailed diagram of this solution is shown below, plus a variation that moves out some of the functionality to a new LCM API Gateway service.
- TODO: More options? Pros and cons per option
Frankfurt impacts
El Alto improvements
External SOL003 Adapter as an Independent deployable component
Frankfurt step
Description
Frankfurt impactsContributions...
View file | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|