Page Comparison

...

General Information:

...

- haven't done the feedback yet
- the comments received are marked in red
- ask for agreement on Tuesday about whether to take these feedback to ETSI, and if permitted, Thinh will provide a contribution back to ETSI
Party proposal
- leftover questions:
  - 1) do we 100% follow TMF? A: No. Would deviate if needed.
  - 2) do we want more detailed proposal?
    - Kevin's plan is to have a skeleton first and fill in the contents where necessary.
- Further comments:
  - There's a comment on the wiki questioning the use case of having the model of vendors.
    - There's code using these concepts (but maybe not actually used), the purpose is to give some visibility. Example: license.
  - use case's relationship with models
    - model without use case seems useless
    - having model discussion first could help understand the use case
    - the models takes time to be mature, so maybe it's better to have model discussions first or at the same time as the use case
    - need motivation for creating the models, it's hard to review the model without understanding the use case
    - suggestion: ask use case subcommittee to review the models? ask use case subcommittee to document the related use cases (e.g., license)?