...
...
...
...
...
...
General Information:
- Date and Time: 2019, April 29nd, 9pm~10pm Beijing Time, 9am~10am US Eastern
- Meeting Room: https://zoom.us/j/645982535
- Meeting Recording:
- Meeting Chat Log:
Agenda:
- Agenda review
- BusinessInteraction proposal review
- Feedback to ETSI
- Party proposal
Material:
Minutes:
- Business Interaction proposal
- no additional comments online
- ask for poll on Tuesday's subcommittee call
- Feedback to ETSI
- Xu has given some comments according to last call
- Kevin would try to prepare with some material to discuss with ETSI on the elementGroup related classes, if the time is tight, would just give some comments and leave it for further study
- Acknowledge the first 2 use cases in the shared IP address slides, Arturo (or Xu) would add it to the comment column after the call
- no additional comments
- encourage people to review the table and the comments before May 1st, when the feedback would be brought back to ETSI
- Party proposal
- Q: why there're both party and organization? A: similar concept in TMF.
- Q: "organization" seems to be better than "party" (in semantics)
- Q: is it related to the BusinessInteraction proposal? A: Yes, would update the BusinessInteraction afterwards (related to agreements, etc.)
- Q: is it planned to remove "simple" in the title? A: done online, and would update the text afterwards.
- Q: why choose TMF? suggest to add rationale
- suggest to simplify the "xxxName" classes (currently only "xxxName" has attributes)
- encourage people to review and leave comments
- 2 raised online:
- 1) do we 100% follow TMF?
- 2) do we want more detailed proposal?
- 2 raised online: