...
| Ref | Blocking? | Status | Component | Description/Notes | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open | DMaaP | This is a reminder that we need to review/discuss about the M4 checklist here | ||||||||||
| 26 | Open | DMaaP | 01/22: Component creation in Jira for DMaaP project: I do not posses "Project" admin rights in JIRA, I only posses DMaaP board rights | |||||||||
| 27 | Open | All | Swagger implementation? 01/28: Swagger is a requirement for Dublin Release (S3P requirements) ? What are the expectations here? Whom can we discuss with? - Sofia Wallin, 01/30: Rich Bennett Mail on this - still cryptic - is it Mandatory - requirement in Platform Maturity 02/06: Dom sent mail looking for clarification - Erik has yet to respond? 02/20: Still no word 02/22: Erik to document what is required 02/27: Still nothing from Erik documented 03/01: Tom to chase Erik up 03/08: Erik to documented beginning of next (hopefully) 03/13: Attend documentation this week 03/15: read the docs vs swagger files and what are they exactly looking for 03/29: Erik has code, just needs to merge (tom to chase up) | |||||||||
| 30 | Open | All | 02/01: Adolfo Perez-Duran The CIA team is preparing to submit contributions to DMAAP to migrate the base images to ONAP Normative Container Base Images. This migration is expected to reduce the image footprint and to enable multi-cpu architecture support for Dublin We expect the work to be minimally disruptive and to coordinate changes with tour team. ubuntu v alpine the talk continues 02/13: Lots of chat on discuss chat - need it to settle down before we implement 02/20: Frank Sandoval [mailto:frank.sandoval@oamtechnologies.com] to provide an update ! 02/20: Dom, Conor & Sunil to assist here Mandar to raise at TSC to see if the right course of action 02/22: Change image & Impacts: Hold off - will these reduce the container footprint? -Dosen't look likely, it is more to be uniform across ONAP 1) suggested we change our Maven approach to use "fabric" plugin instead of spotify (support for this has discontinued) plugin 2) use docker file instead of POM is recommended from spotify (currently we don't use except CSIT environment) 02/27: lets pose question to frank 02/27: Alpine is the decision for Dublin 03/01: Questions mailed to Frank - awaiting response testing changes - and need to send gerrit review to Dom 03/08: Frank made changes in relation to Alpine images only (unit test seems ok, built in jenkins - images not pushed to docker repo - investigation ongoing? Dom to check CSIT tests, Gerry to see if DR have similar issue) 03/13: Need to chase up with Frank in relation to jenkins build not pushing up images new image name is bc - oom changes pending 03/15: Frank merged 4 commits today, Dom & Sunil to be put on review 03/20: Worse - images not getting pushed, old images are no longer there CI-MGMT - where is the review? Dom to reach out 03/22: Switch to Alpine broke 2 things in BC
DR our daily builds are failing - Frank investigating New CI - MGMT push has impacts on Casablanca jobs ( not using Alpine ) - is a bug required here? Potentially only effects DR 03/29: MR having issues, CIA team looking into 04/03: Frank from CIA team still working on this 04/08 Just waiting on MR | |||||||||
| 32 | Open | All | No more running as root on containers Proposed Updates to Release Templates (Dublin) - Security Questions Is it required for M2 ? 02/11 Doesn't need to be implemented by M2, nice to have for M4. (Try to plan for M4). Here's the link to the Jira where applications are being asked to update their impact and concerns regarding this item.
02/13: Dublin timeframe - Not mandatory, if possible complete, if not have a backlog item for El Alto Mandar to update ticket 02/15: ticket updated to work on this in El Alto - Mandar to ask reporter how do we interpret this ticket? created ticket in backlog 02/27: Is this related to Alpine solution - not clear New requirement : Wanted position to be part of Dublin 03/04: Action to start investigating - how will this be verified - Mandar 03/08: krzysztof to write script to enable verifcation -mandar to chase up "Actually the script can be merged into oneliner:
kubectl --namespace=onap get pods | tail -n +2 | awk '{print $1}' |\ xargs -d \\n -I % kubectl --namespace=onap exec '%' -- /bin/sh -c \ 'ps aux | sed "s/^/%\t/"' | tee ps-all.txt
What it does it just exec into every pod and list processes that runs as a root. In general, if you run container using docker you can use user namespaces and match a root user inside the container to any uid on the host that you want but according kubernetes doc user namespace are not supported which effectively means that if sth runs as a root inside the container it is also a root on a host (just certain capabilities may be dropped)
Best regards, -- Krzysztof Opasiak" 03/13: Mail forward onto team 03/20: what is required, when is it achievable 03/29: Required by M4 (think its delayed to 11/4?) 04/01: work in progress for DR Code is Merged for DR - https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/83879/ | |||||||||
| 35 | Open | Logging | 02/15: Mail sent from Emmett - any feedback in relation to this? Is it Mandatory or not? Manageability as part of platform maturity requirements Target level is 2 for Dublin - mandatory 02/27: Create EPIC - 03/11: Epic created in Jira :
03/15: appears to be a stretch goal for existing components 04/08 Code upp for review emmet to provide link 04/08: Code review for updating DR to log under a single logging system: https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/78851/ | |||||||||
| 37 | Open | All | 03/15: 55% code coverage target is for M4 03/20: code and line coverage to be > 55% 04/01: DR approx at 60% Mandar working on code coverage for MR 04/03: DmaaP client and BC (52%) is only outstanding concern | |||||||||
| 40 | Open | All | 03/15: All to review and report back 04/01: Mandar reviewed and may need clarification on one or two points | |||||||||
| 43 | Open | All | 04/01 - Helm deploy fail when DMaaP deploy on own - only deploying bc post install Sunil has seen timeout issue - DOM looking into how best to facilitate this recommend to use commit shared above in https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/83671/ Tested the above patch (WITH AAF ENABLED) and deployed successfully. 04/03: All is ok once tested with Patch above if one job doesn't finish others might not run BC will allow others to provisioning topics/feed during run time Mirror Maker crash loop - 500 error 08/05 Issue not reproduced. If item has not been reproduced item will be closed | |||||||||
| 44 | Open | All | DR node reg with BC client? - Hook is in place, values need to pass still to be determined post install hooks, flag can be added to keep alive. |
...