...
| Practice Area | Checkpoint | Yes/No | Evidences | How to? | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security | Has the Release Security/Vulnerability table been updated in the protected Security Vulnerabilities wiki space? | Yes | /wiki/spaces/SV/pages/16089364 | PTL reviews the NexusIQ scans for their project repos and fills out the vulnerability review table | |||||||
| Has the project committed to enabling transport level encryption on all interfaces and the option to turn it off? | Yes | Requirements and test cases for transport layer encryption have been created for all interfaces not currently supporting encryption. we are running in two ports ,one for https, one for http. | |||||||||
| Has the project documented all open port information? | Yes | Update OOM NodePort List | |||||||||
| Has the project provided the communication policy to OOM and Integration? | Yes |
| Recommended Protocols | ||||||||
| Do you have a plan to address by M4 the Critical and High vulnerabilities in the third party libraries used within your project? | Yes |
| |||||||||
| Architecture | Has the Project team reviewed the APIs with the Architecture Committee (ARC)? | Yes | Architecture walk through to understand how each project contributes on Release Use Case. ARC to organize the walk through. | ||||||||
| Is there a plan to address the findings the API review? | N/A | Link to plan | The plan could be as simple as a Jira issue to track the implementation of findings or a documented plan within the wiki. | ||||||||
| Does the team clearly understand that no changes in the API definition is allowed without formal TSC review and approval? | Yes | In the case some changes are necessary, bring the request to the TSC for review and approval. | |||||||||
Is there any changes in the scope, functionalities, deliverable, dependency, resources, API, repositories since M1 milestone? | No | If Yes, please a link to the evidence of these changes. | Critical point to understand is that change is inevitable, and that right timing and clear communication to the community will ease the process of accepting changes. | ||||||||
| Provide link to the API Documentation. | Yes | ||||||||||
| Release Management | Are committed Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Closed" in Jira board? | Yes | VNFSDK Dublin Kanban | ||||||||
| Are all tasks associated with Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Closed" in Jira? | N/A | As the team is using a Kanban approach,there is no Sprint. | |||||||||
| Have all findings from previous milestones been addressed? | Yes | ||||||||||
| Development | Is there any pending commit request older than 36 Business hours in Gerrit? | No | Gerrit Query: status:open label:verified -is:draft -label:Code-Review=-1 AND -label:Code-Review=-2 AND is:mergeable age:1week | ||||||||
| Has the project team reach the Automated Unit Test Code Coverage expectation? (Refer to artifacts available in Sonar) | WIP | Goal: 55% for Incubation project in the current release 2019/03/13: VNFSDK refrepo: 52.3%
| Guidance on Code Coverage and Static Code Analysis Tools: Sonar | ||||||||
Are all the Jenkins jobs successfully passed ( Merge-Jobs)? | Yes | Jenkins VNFSDK | |||||||||
| Are all binaries available in Nexus? | Yes | ||||||||||
| Integration and Testing | Have 50% of System Integration Testing Use Cases been implemented successfully in Jenkins? It should include at least 1 CSIT that will be run on Lab-xxx-OOM-Daily Jenkins Job | Yes | Provide link to evidence | ||||||||
| Has the project code successfully passed the Daily Build process? | Yes | Jenkins VNFSDK | Goal is to ensure the latest project commit has not broken the Integration Daily Build | ||||||||
Has the project passed the Integration Sanity Tests? | Yes | Jenkins VNFSDK | Integration sanity tests in Dublin Release cover:
No test failure reported on http://onapci.org/grafana/d/8cGRqBOmz/daily-summary?orgId=1 No Integration Blocking Issue with no workaround: Dublin Release Integration Test Blocking Issues | ||||||||
| Modeling | Has the Project team provided links to Data Models (e.g, JSON, YANG, Swagger, etc.) for all Shared Information (e.g., APIs, API Payload, Shared Design Model)? | Yes | VNFSDK use ONAP R4+ Onboarding PNFD based on ETSI NFV SOL001 to do the PNF pre-onboarding/validation VNFSDK also use tosca model to do the compliance check. VNFSDK provide the swagger here : Marketplace | It is a non-blocking item for M3 - The Modeling team is gathering information |
...