Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Updated to include Feature Requirements wording (see underlined)

...

Practice AreaCheckpointYes/NoEvidencesHow to?

Information and Data Modeling

Has the Project team described the information exchanges in support of Use Cases and Feature Requirements demonstrating an existing Use Case ?

YES/NO

If Yes, please provide link to the specific Use Cases / Feature Requirement and associated Sequence Diagrams.

Describe the interactions and behavior of each Information Exchange with the Use Case templates / Feature Requirements and Sequence Diagrams.

Has the Project team proposed a Data Model for all Shared Information (e.g., APIs, API Payload, Shared Design Model)?

YES/NO

If Yes, please provide link to the Data Model.

Data Models (e.g., JSON, YANG, etc.) that define the data exchanged or shared.

Has the Project team created an initial mapping of the data elements in the Data Models into the ONAP Common Information Model?

YES/NO

If Yes, please provide link to the Data Element Mapping.

Mapping to understand how the data elements relate to the ONAP Common Information Model. (see: Modeling sub-committee)

Has the Project team reviewed the proposed Data Models and Use Case artifacts with the Modeling Sub-Committee?


YES/NO

If Yes, please provide link to the review findings.

Modeling walkthrough to understand how each project contributes to the ONAP Common Information Model. Modeling Sub-Committee to organize the walkthrough

Is there a plan to address the findings of the initial Information / Data Modeling review?

YES/NO

If Yes, please provide link to the plan.

The plan could be as simple as a Jira issue to track the resolution of findings or a documented plan within the wiki.

...