Page Comparison

Versions Compared

Key

This line was added.
This line was removed.
Formatting was changed.

General Information:

Date and Time: 2019, February 04, 10pm~11pm Beijing Time, 9am~10am US Eastern
Meeting Room: https://zoom.us/j/645982535

Agenda:

Agenda reviewR4 High Level Requirements
Modeling Current Activity Status
Current R3 Clean Compare with IFA011 V2.5.11ff
Root Class Analysis

Material:

Minutes:

...

Modeling Current Activity Status
We briefly reviewed the current activity lists.  We need to focus on bringing these items to closure.
Current R3 Clean Compare with IFA011 V2.5.1:ONAP Root Analysis
R4 High Level Requirements:
Jessie walked us through the analysis. The compare was made against the R2 WIKI table, with some peeks at the Papyrus model. Observations made include:
Removal of certain material including references to yaml, or which version of IFA the definitions came from the ONAP model
Fixing things that were specified as dentifiers that should be relationships
A number of attributes need to be updated to "deprecated".
VnfElemenetGroups was tagged as obsolete.
Discussion about restricting the enum list, or even using enums rather than strings due to handling updates.   Maybe a discussion item in the Tuesday modeling calls?
May need to look at IFA014 for some material.
Replace vnicorder with order
There are a number of ifa011 defined entities related to deployment flavor that we do not have. Should we include them? Suggestion from Alex is to include them
We do not want analyze and have two consensus votes, on for the WIKI and another for the Papyrus output.   One approach could be for the Resource team to provide comments on the Wiki compare in the next two weeks, and use that as a basis to update the Papyrus model, and perform a consensus vote on that output.
ONAP Root Analysis
Did not have time to discuss this agenda item.
Next call: