Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

This page hosts information about discussion calls dedicated to R3+ service modeling.

...

  • Nov 7, Wednesday TBD 

Proposed Agenda

  • how to model NS in A&AI 

Past calls

20181024

Agenda

  • Architecture F2F Meeting Planning From ServiceIM perspective
  • View file
    nameArchitecture F2F Planning - Service IM.pptx
    height250


...

              Will start service model discussion for R4 on 10.10.

20180829

Agenda

  • Continued discussion about NS onboading or other issues. 
  • Review Service model in ONAP Information model in Papyrus.

...

Lingli Deng (China Mobile), Gil Bullard (AT&T), Mehmet (Verizon), Thinh Nguyenphu (Nokia), Xu Yang (Huawei), Andy Mayer (AT&T), Hui Deng (Huawei), Emmanuel Sarris (Vodafone) , Maopeng Zhang (ZTE)

Minutes

  • Continued discussion about NS onboading or other issues. ?Proposed Approach for ONAP Runtime Support of Network Service Onboarding?
    • Agreed ONAP should be evolving as a generic platform offering features as expected by the service providers in its service provisioning
    • There is a difference in defining a service from the rest of industry from the perspective of a consumer rather than the implementation modules/system (as a collection of constitute resources, configuration scripts, etc.)
    • Agreed to continue discussion on this and welcome Mehmet's presentation on MEF Interlude
    • A request to clean up on the wiki workspace for further input to network service descriptor is raised
  • Review Service model in ONAP Information model in Papyrus.

...

1. VFC requirements for NSD (Yan Yang)  

2. Resource/Service IM decision on NSD  (Xu Yang)

3.  NSD Proposal (maopeng zhang)

...