Recording
Agenda Items
| Title | Responsible | Status |
|---|
| Last discussed | Notes | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schema Service |
| 1st Nov 2018 | Discuss about the Schema Microservice 11th Oct: Use Cases for Dynamic AAI Schema Changes 1st Nov: William Reehil Robby Maharajh Venkata Harish Kajur will review requirement updates and research the open questions so that a final draft can be prepared for implementation |
| AAI HAProxy and 2-way-TLS |
| Technical solution to either decommission the proxy or make design changes to AAF to enable client side certificates. | ||||||||
| Jackson Replacement |
| 1st Nov 2018 | Security subcommittee has recommended teams move away from jackson, and will be presenting alternatives and asking for an assessment from each project. Our team will need to do an analysis - this would not be trivial, especially given how many of our repos are impacted. As of now, this would be a very high LOE for the team, we need to understand what the recommendation from the SECCOM is before we can provide better details on what the LOE would be. Updated: Using Google gson vs FasterXML Jackson 10th Oct: Present to Seccom meeting 15th Oct: Present to PTL meeting 31st Oct: Debatable whether the cost of swapping Cassandra and changing code is worth the benefit of removing Jackson from the vulnerabilities list. On-Hold until James Forsyth consults with other PTLs |
| AAI too slow for Holmes |
| 1st Nov 2018 | Guangrong Fu mentioned AAI in Baseline Measurements based on Testing Results:
The problem for caching is how to know when to update the cached data. Even though the access time may be fast for Holmes, the risk is using out-of-date data, so the correlations will be wrong anyway. Also, duplicating the AAI data outside of AAI is probably a bad architectural decision. Making AAI faster for these use cases would be better. Has there been a performance analysis of where the time is spent? Could it help to use ElasticSearch (e.g. as in sparky)? Should Holmes have a batch interface to get more AAI data in fewer calls? Or a better correlation API that results in fewer calls? 31st Oct: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/topic/27805753 1st Nov:
|
| 2 Types of logging in A&AI WS |
| 1st Nov 2018 | There are 2 types of logging in the services
Is that correct? Shouldn't there be just 1 type? 1st Nov: After Casablanca release investigate logging guidelines and figure out what library to use in order to unify logging within A&AI |
| Disable unused web services |
| 1st Nov 2018 | Could we disable unused (i.e. not integrated) A&AI web services, so that the deployment is faster and the resource footprint is smaller? e.g. Champ (any other ws?) Motivation: Decrease the resource footprint for A&AI (ONAP) deployments Idea: we could support 2 different deployments 1. full (normal) deployment and 2. barebones deployment. The point of the "barebone" deployment would be to deploy only the essential services necessary for proper functioning of A&AI (leaving out services like cacher, sparky, graphadmin, having 1 cassandra node instead of 3 or 5 etc). In order to reduce hardware/cloud costs (mainly the memory footprint) it could be beneficial to support a minimalistic A&AI deployment. 1st Nov: Venkata Harish Kajur Former user (Deleted) - investigate how to disable/enable charts in A&AI so we can create a core group of pods which handle the use-cases and than extended group will all the services. Consider a group of unused/unintegrated services (like Champ). Consider other possible groups (like GUI?) |
| AAI Champ |
| 1st Nov 2018 |
|
| Spring profiles |
| Do we need the “production” profile? | ||||||||
| OOM Artifacts |
| Some of our top level OOM deployment artifacts are not unique (i.e. don’t take namespace into account as all other deployables), is that intentional? | ||||||||
| Return codes and messages for WS |
| Is there a guide for the description of the error message and the error codes? How are new error states (message + code) added? | ||||||||
| Rocket.Chat support |
| In order to use rocket chat with native client (and have notifications for example) it needs a TLS cert. Support for integration team? Former user (Deleted) will create a rocket chat channel AAI James Forsyth created private group aai-dev in the integration rocketchat server - if you need access (Keong Lim, William Reehil, William LaMont, Manisha Aggarwal, Tian Lee, Steve Blimkie, Arul Nambi, Francis Paquette, CT Paterson, Giulio Graziani , Mark Leonard, Edward Dening, Bo Lv anybody else?) please contact Jimmy and I'll add your rocketchat ID. Rocketchat server: http://onap-integration.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com:3000 | ||||||||
| Copyright license header restricted to 1 company |
| In the copyright /** * ============LICENSE_START======================================================= * org.onap.aai * ================================================================================ * Copyright © 2017-2018 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. If there is a company other than AT&T the build fails saying the license header is wrong | ||||||||
| AAI Traversal queries |
| The AAI Traversal API is fairly complex, are there examples and descriptions of what the inputs and outputs of the rest api are, or alternative way to gain know-how? Code is quite difficult to read. | ||||||||
| Dublin 5G Use Case |
Last discussion: 24th Oct 2018 | 25th Oct 2018 | Dublin AAI changes in support of 5g use cases. Link for presentation: 5G - PNF Plug and Play (Casablanca carry-over items)
|
25th Oct 2018