Status column
...
...
| Status |
|---|
| colour | Yellow |
|---|
| title | In Progress |
|---|
|
...
...
...
...
Attendees
Recording
Agenda Items
| Title | Responsible | Status | Notes |
|---|
| Dublin 5G Use Case | | | Status |
|---|
| colour | Yellow |
|---|
| title | In Progress |
|---|
|
| Dublin AAI changes in support of 5g use cases. Link for presentation: 5G - PNF Plug and Play (Casablanca carry-over items) # | R4 TOPIC |
|---|
| 1 | NF A&AI: S/W Image Repository Info | | 2 | NF A&AI: Cloud Home Info | | 3 | NF A&AI: External Manager IP Address | | 4 | NF A&AI: S/W Version Object Association |
|
| Schema Service | | | Status |
|---|
| colour | Yellow |
|---|
| title | In Progress |
|---|
|
| |
| Jackson Replacement | | | Status |
|---|
| colour | Yellow |
|---|
| title | In Progress |
|---|
|
| Security subcommittee has recommended teams move away from jackson, and will be presenting alternatives and asking for an assessment from each project. Our team will need to do an analysis - this would not be trivial, especially given how many of our repos are impacted. As of now, this would be a very high LOE for the team, we need to understand what the recommendation from the SECCOM is before we can provide better details on what the LOE would be. Updated: Using Google gson vs FasterXML Jackson 10th Oct: Present to Seccom meeting 15th Oct: Present to PTL meeting |
| Disable unused web services | | | Could we disable unused (i.e. not integrated) A&AI web services, so that the deployment is faster and the resource footprint is smaller? e.g. Champ (any other ws?) |
| AAI HAProxy and 2-way-TLS | | | Technical solution to either decommission the proxy or make design changes to AAF to enable client side certificates. |
| AAI Traversal queries | | | The AAI Traversal API is fairly complex, are there examples and descriptions of what the inputs and outputs of the rest api are, or alternative way to gain know-how? Code is quite difficult to read. |
| AAI Champ | | | - Who is responsible for the project?
- What is the roadmap for the project?
- Who will do the integration?
- Can we turn it off in OOM as it only wastes resources?
|
| Spring profiles | | | Do we need the “production” profile? |
| OOM Artifacts | | | Some of our top level OOM deployment artifacts are not unique (i.e. don’t take namespace into account as all other deployables), is that intentional |
?New column | Former user (Deleted) | | Status |
|---|
| colour | Yellow |
|---|
| title | In Progress |
|---|
|
Proposing new column Status, where:
- topic not yet discussed| Status |
|---|
| colour | Yellow |
|---|
| title | In Progress |
|---|
|
- being worked on - not being worked on and not finished - topic finished, can be closed and removedKeong: The "status" mirrors a JIRA case workflow. Should we open JIRA cases to track progress and link them here They can also be linked/searched from the Meeting Notes pages.Keong: Also just to use up the available colours from Confluence macro, suggest:
- - topic finished, any in-progress work was abandoned
Pavel: Keong Lim - I think some agenda items don't justify opening and managing a JIRA ticket, but if the agenda item leads to a real task that someone should perform then we definately should create a JIRA for that. The "Cancelled" status is a marvelous idea! |
| Return codes and messages for WS | | | Is there a guide for the description of the error message and the error codes? How are new error states (message + code) added? |
| Rocket.Chat support | | | In order to use rocket chat with native client (and have notifications for example) it needs a TLS cert. Support for integration team? |
| Support for 2 OOM deployment types | | | Motivation: Decrease the resource footprint for A&AI (ONAP) deployments Idea: we could support 2 different deployments 1. full (normal) deployment and 2. barebones deployment. The point of the "barebone" deployment would be to deploy only the essential services necessary for proper functioning of A&AI (leaving out services like cacher, sparky, graphadmin, having 1 cassandra node instead of 3 or 5 etc). In order to reduce hardware/cloud costs (mainly the memory footprint) it could be beneficial to support a minimalistic A&AI deployment. |