Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
  • Rationale
    • The BPMN Monitoring has been defined as a pain point since the Amsterdam release. Camunda cockpit regardless community or enterprise editions were designed from a BPMN process management perspective. Camunda is not an OSS vendor, and they don’t have a reason to cover service-level monitoring. As a result, it does not meet service-level orchestration monitoring from the OSS perspective.

    • Search is an Camunda enterprise feature, but we need to provide searching capabilitiy capability for non-enterprise edition.
      • Finding right process instance(s) for a NS/VNF service request is tedious and hassle.
      • To facilitate monitoring, we need more than what Camunda Community/Enterprise edition supports.
      • provides the process monitoring (instance-search) hyperlink to the SO clients for launching process monitoring.
        • Automates tedious manual steps for finding target process instance(s), bypassing tedious search starting from the process defintions.
        • Access customized SO Monitoring Service List (or Camunda Cockpit widgets) from VID, UUI and external API users.
    • If a service provider uses Camunda Enterprise edition, they can still utilize this SO monitoring on top of Camunda enterprise edition features.
    • Many of Camunda enterprise features such as CRUDV and version control of process definitions would be part of SDC.
      • ONAP separated workflow design and runtime.
      • Several enterprise features are not part of SO monitoring features and are not applicable.
    • What are current TOSCA orchestrator monitoring capabilities?
      • SO monitoring should cover both imperative and declarative orchestration.
      • Question: can we have a kind of uniform way of monitoring?

...