...
| Practice Area | Checkpoint | Yes/No | Evidences | How to? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Has the Project team reviewed the APIs with the Architecture Committee (ARC)? | Yes | Reviewed on 3/6/18 | Architecture walkthrough to understand how each project contributes on Release Use Case. ARC to organize the walkthrough. |
| Is there a plan to address the findings the API review? | N/A | No findings | The plan could be as simple as a Jira issue to track the implementation of findings or a documented plan within the wiki. | |
| Does the team clearly understand that no changes in the API definition is allowed without formal TSC review and approval? | Yes | NA | In the case some changes are necessary, bring the request to the TSC for review and approval. | |
Is there any changes in the scope, functionalities, deliverable, dependency, resources, API, repositories since M1 milestone? | No | If Yes, please a link to the evidence of these changes.Yes | Traffic Migration meeting notes | Critical point to understand is that change is inevitable, and that right timing and clear communication to the community will ease the process of accepting changes. |
| Provide link to the API Documentation. | Yes | APPC LCM API Guide | ||
| Release Management | Are committed Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Done" in Jira board? | Yes | APPC Board | |
| Are all tasks associated with Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Done" in Jira? | Yes | APPC Board | ||
| Have all findings from previous milestones been addressed? | N/A | No previous findings | ||
| Development | Has the project team reach the Automated Unit Test Code Coverage expectation? (Refer to artifacts available in Sonar) | In-Progress | Goal: 50% for Incubation project in Beijing | Guidance on Code Coverage and Static Code Analysis |
| Is there any pending commit request older than 36 Business hours in Gerrit? | No | |||
Do you have a plan to address by M4 the Critical vulnerabilities in the third party libraries used within your project? | In-Progress | Not all issues will be possible to resolve in Beijing. We will document those in the security template. | Ensure by M4 the Nexus-IQ report from “Jenkins CLM” shows 0 critical security vulnerability. Open the Nexus-IQ report for the details on each repo. | |
| Are all the Jenkins jobs successfully passed ( Merge-Jobs)? | Yes | Provide link to evidence | ||
| Are all binaries available in Nexus? | Yes | Provide link to evidence | ||
| Integration and Testing | Have 50 % of System Integration Testing Use Cases been implemented successfully in Jenkins? | Yes | https://jenkins.onap.org/view/CSIT/job/appc-master-verify-csit-healthcheck/ | |
| Has the project code successfully passed the Daily Build process? | One jjb being investigated | We are currently having issues with
| Goal is to ensure the latest project commit has not broken the Integration Daily Build |