Versions Compared

Old Version 1

changes.mady.by.user Lior Nachmias

Saved on

compared with

New Version 2

changes.mady.by.user Lior Nachmias

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

AreaActual LevelTargeted Level for current ReleaseEvidence/Associated User StoryComments
PerformanceLevel 0Level 10

Didn't require additional work in R2

  • 0 -- none
  • 1 – baseline performance criteria identified and measured
  • 2 & 3 – performance improvement plans created & implemented
StabilityLevel 0Level 1

WIP

  • 0 – none
  • 1 – 72 hours component level soak w/random transactions
  • 2 – 72 hours platform level soak w/random transactions
  • 3 – 6 months track record of reduced defect rate
ResiliencyLevel 1Level 21
Didn't require additional work in R2


  • 0 – none
  • 1 – manual failure and recovery (< 30 minutes)
  • 2 – automated detection and recovery (single site)
  • 3 – automated detection and recovery (geo redundancy)
SecurityLevel 0Level 1

WIP

  • 0 – none
  • 1 – CII Passing badge + 50% Test Coverage
  • 2 – CII Silver badge; internal communication encrypted; role-based access control and authorization for all calls
  • 3 – CII Gold
ScalabilityLevel 0Level 10

Didn't require additional work in R2

  • 0 – no ability to scale
  • 1 – single site horizontal scaling
  • 2 – geographic scaling
  • 3 – scaling across multiple ONAP instances
ManageabilityLevel 0Level 0

Didn't require additional work in R2. SDC and VID. For Manageability, instantiation in < 1 hour is already supported. No plan to support single loging in Beijing.

  • 1 – single logging system across components; instantiation in < 1 hour
  • 2 – ability to upgrade a single component; tracing across components; externalized configuration management
UsabilityLevel 1Level 1

lWIP

  • 1 – user guide; deployment documentation; API documentation
  • 2 – UI consistency; usability testing; tutorial documentation