...
| Practice Area | Checkpoint | Yes/No | Evidences | How to? | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product Management | Have all JIRA Stories supporting the release use case been implemented? | No |
| For each JIRA story that are implemented in Amsterdam Release, you have to setup in JIRA the JIRA fixVersion="Amsterdam Release" | |||||||||||||||||||
| List the Stories that will not be implemented in this current Release. | Yes |
| For each JIRA story that will not be implemented in Amsterdam Release, you have to setup in JIRA the JIRA fixVersion="Beijing Release" | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Are committed Sprint Backlog Stories been coded and marked as "Done" in Jira? | No |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Are all tasks associated with committed Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Done" in Jira? | No |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Release Management | Have all issues pertaining to FOSS been addressed? | N/A | No FOSS issues | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Have all findings from previous milestones been addressed? | N/A - no previous findings | List previous milestone issues that have not been addressed. | For M2 and M3 Milestones, ensure all findings have been closed. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Has the Project Team reviewed and understood the most recent license scan reports from the LF, for both (a) licenses within the codebase and (b) licenses for third-party build time dependencies? | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| For both (a) and (b), have all high priority non-Project Licenses been either removed or escalated as likely exception requests? | Yes | 2 License Issues were from ONAP Portal SDK project dependencies | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Development | Are all Defects of priority Highest and High in status "Done" in Jira? | Yes |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Has the project team reach the Automated Unit Test Code Coverage expectation? (Refer to artifacts available in Sonar) | Yes | Goal: 50% for Incubation project in Beijing | For evidences, provide link(s) to Gerrit repos by providing the URL as shown in this example | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Is there any binaries (jar, war, tar, gz, gzip, zip files) in Gerrit project repository? | No | Refer to CI Development Best Practices | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Is there any pending commit request older than 36 hours in Gerrit? | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provide the "% Achived" on the CII Best Practices program. | 97% | https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/en/projects/1614 | As documented in CII Badging Program, teams have to fill out CII Best Practices | ||||||||||||||||||||
Is there any Critical level security vulnerabilities older than 60 days old in the third party libraries used within your project unaddressed?
| No | In the case critical known vulnerability are still showing in the report, fill out the Security/Vulnerability Threat Template in your project. | Ensure the Nexus-IQ report from “Jenkins CLM” shows 0 critical security vulnerability. Open the Nexus-IQ report for the details on each repo. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Are all the Jenkins jobs successfully passed (verify + merge jobs)? | Yes | https://jenkins.onap.org/view/policy/job/policy-common-master-merge-java/ https://jenkins.onap.org/view/policy/job/policy-drools-applications-master-merge-java/ https://jenkins.onap.org/view/policy/job/policy-engine-master-merge-java/ https://jenkins.onap.org/view/policy/job/policy-drools-pdp-master-merge-java/ | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Are all snapshot binaries available in Nexus? | Yes | https://nexus.onap.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/onap/policy/ | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Do you have a clear plan to implement the Independent Versioning and Release Process by RC0? | Yes | Policy R1 Beijing Independent Versioning And Release Process Plan | Contact the upstream teams to make sure they will release their artifacts (in Nexus Release repo) so you can build by depending on these released artifacts by RC0. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Integration and Testing | Have 100% of Continuous System Integration Testing (CSIT) Use Cases been implemented successfully in Jenkins? | NoYes | All jobs pertaining to your project MUST pass https://jenkins.onap.org/view/policy/job/policy-master-csit-health/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Is there a Docker images available for your project deliverable? | Yes | Provide link to Nexus repos | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Has the project code successfully passed the Daily Build process? | No | 3/28/2018 - still waiting for some S3P functionality to be merged before being able to release.Yes | https://jenkins.onap.org/view/policy/job/policy-common-master-release-version-java-daily/ https://jenkins.onap.org/view/policy/job/policy-drools-pdp-master-docker-java-version-shell-daily/ https://jenkins.onap.org/view/policy/job/policy-engine-master-docker-java-version-shell-daily/ | Goal is to ensure the latest project commit has not broken the Integration Daily Build | |||||||||||||||||||
| Doc | Has the team created a docs folder and Development and Release Notes documentation templates in Readthedocs? | Yes | http://onap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submodules/policy/engine.git/docs/index.html | Documentation Team is using Readthedocs for documenting user facing documentation. ReadTheDcos shall be considered as a starting point for someone new within ONAP. The ReadTheDocs is the ONAP Documentation facade visible to users. Link to Templates | |||||||||||||||||||
| Is the API documentation section populated? | Yes | http://onap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submodules/policy/engine.git/docs/platform/offeredapis.html | Ensure there is at least a direct link toward the API documentation which may be already existing in the wiki. |