...
| Practice Area | Checkpoint | Yes/No | Evidences | How to? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Has the Project team reviewed the APIs with the Architecture Committee (ARC)? | Yes | https://jira.onap.org/browse/ONAPARC-94 | |
| Is there a plan to address the findings the API review? | The plan could be as simple as a Jira issue to track the implementation of findings or a documented plan within the wiki. | |||
| Does the team clearly understand that no changes in the API definition is allowed without formal TSC review and approval? | Yes | NA | In the case some changes are necessary, bring the request to the TSC for review and approval. | |
Is there any changes in the scope, functionalities, deliverable, dependency, resources, API, repositories since M1 milestone? | Yes | VNF scale out is removed from our scope for R2, and moved into R3. | Critical point to understand is that change is inevitable, and that right timing and clear communication to the community will ease the process of accepting changes. | |
| Provide link to the API Documentation. | Yes | OSDF: HAS | ||
| Release Management | Are committed Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Done" in Jira board? | Yes | https://jira.onap.org/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OPTFRA%20AND%20type%20%3D%20Story%20and%20resolution%20%3D%20done%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC | |
| Are all tasks associated with Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Done" in Jira? | Yes | https://jira.onap.org/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OPTFRA%20AND%20type%20%3D%20Task%20%20and%20resolution%20%3D%20done%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC | ||
| Have all findings from previous milestones been addressed? | NA | |||
| Development | Has the project team reach the Automated Unit Test Code Coverage expectation? (Refer to artifacts available in Sonar) | Goal: 50% for Incubation project in BeijingNo | repo-level coverage: OSDF: 67% - https://sonar.onap.org/dashboard?id=org.onap.optf.osdf%3Aoptf-osdf HAS: 31% - https://sonar.onap.org/dashboard?id=org.onap.optf.has%3Aoptf-has | Guidance on Code Coverage and Static Code Analysis |
| Is there any pending commit request older than 36 Business hours in Gerrit? | No | |||
Do you have a plan to address by M4 the Critical vulnerabilities in the third party libraries used within your project? | NA | Both repos of OOF have no critical vulnerabilities currently. | Ensure by M4 the Nexus-IQ report from “Jenkins CLM” shows 0 critical security vulnerability. Open the Nexus-IQ report for the details on each repo. | |
| Are all the Jenkins jobs successfully passed ( Merge-Jobs)? | Yes | https://jenkins.onap.org/view/optf/job/optf-has-master-conductor-merge-java/ https://jenkins.onap.org/view/optf/job/optf-osdf-master-osdf-merge-java/ | ||
| Are all binaries available in Nexus? | Yes | https://nexus.onap.org/content/groups/staging/org/onap/optf/ | ||
| Integration and Testing | Have 50 % of System Integration Testing Use Cases been implemented successfully in Jenkins? | Provide link to evidence | ||
| Has the project code successfully passed the Daily Build process? | Yes | https://jenkins.onap.org/view/optf/ | Goal is to ensure the latest project commit has not broken the Integration Daily Build |