...
| Practice Area | Checkpoint | Yes/No | Evidences | How to? | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Has the Project team reviewed the APIs with the Architecture Committee (ARC)? | Architecture walkthrough to understand how each project contributes on Release Use Case. ARC to organize the walkthrough. | |||||||||||
| Is there a plan to address the findings the API review? | Link to plan | The plan could be as simple as a Jira issue to track the implementation of findings or a documented plan within the wiki. | |||||||||||
| Does the team clearly understand that no changes in the API definition is allowed without formal TSC review and approval? | NA | In the case some changes are necessary, bring the request to the TSC for review and approval. | |||||||||||
Is there any changes in the scope, functionalities, deliverable, dependency, resources, API, repositories since M1 milestone? | If Yes, please a link to the evidence of these changes. | Critical point to understand is that change is inevitable, and that right timing and clear communication to the community will ease the process of accepting changes. | |||||||||||
| Provide link to the API Documentation. | |||||||||||||
| Release Management | Are committed Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Done" in Jira board? | Provide Link to Project backlogYes | https://jira.onap.org/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=25&projectKey=MSB&view=planning.nodetail | ||||||||||
| Are all tasks associated with Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Done" in Jira? | Yes | https://jira.onap.org/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=25&projectKey=MSB&view=planning.nodetail | |||||||||||
| Have all findings from previous milestones been addressed?Provide link to JIRA findings | Yes |
| |||||||||||
| Development | Has the project team reach the Automated Unit Test Code Coverage expectation? (Refer to artifacts available in Sonar)Goal: 50% for Incubation project in Beijing | Yes | https://sonar.onap.org/dashboard?id=org.onap.msb.discovery%3Amsb-discovery-parent https://sonar.onap.org/dashboard?id=org.onap.msb.apigateway%3Amsb-apigateway-parent https://sonar.onap.org/dashboard?id=org.onap.msb.swagger-sdk%3Aswagger-sdk https://sonar.onap.org/dashboard?id=org.onap.msb.java-sdk%3Amsb-java-sdk | Guidance on Code Coverage and Static Code Analysis | |||||||||
| Is there any pending commit request older than 36 Business hours in Gerrit? | No | ||||||||||||
Do you have a plan to address by M4 the Critical vulnerabilities in the third party libraries used within your project? | Yes | Ensure by M4 the Nexus-IQ report from “Jenkins CLM” shows 0 critical security vulnerability. Open the Nexus-IQ report for the details on each repo. | |||||||||||
| Are all the Jenkins jobs successfully passed ( Merge-Jobs)? | Provide link to evidenceYes | https://jenkins.onap.org/view/msb/ | |||||||||||
| Are all binaries available in Nexus?Provide link to evidence | Yes | maven lib: https://nexus.onap.org/#nexus-search;quick~msb docker: https://nexus3.onap.org/#browse/search=keyword%3Dmsb | |||||||||||
| Integration and Testing | Have 50 % of System Integration Testing Use Cases been implemented successfully in Jenkins? | Provide link to evidenceYes | https://jenkins.onap.org/view/msb/ | ||||||||||
| Has the project code successfully passed the Daily Build process? | Yes | Goal is to ensure the latest project commit has not broken the Integration Daily Build |