Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Table of Contents
outlinetrue


Overview

Project NameApplication Authorization Framework
Target Release NameEnter the name of the release you are targeting to deliverBeijing  Release
Project Lifecycle StateEither Incubation, Core, Mature. Refer to ONAP Charter, section 3.3 Project Lifecycle for further information
Participating Company List the company participating in this release. At least 3-4 organizations, including an operator are recommended.AT&T, Intel, Tech Mahindra

Scope

What is this release trying to address?

Describe the problem being solved by this releaseAAF trying to address the secured communication threw certificate management & token based Authentication,Authorization

Use Cases

Describe the use case this release is targeted for (better if reference to customer use case).The existing Amsterdam use cases are still going to be supported and additional use cases related to the will be supported for the Beijing Release

Minimum Viable Product

Describe the MVP for this releaseFor Beijing release, the minimum viable product we are targeting is  integrating AAF  with multiple ONAP applications and perform secured transactions.

Functionalities

List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.

...

Deliverable Name

Deliverable Description

AAF integration with Appc

AAF Git repository
AAF source codeAAF Git repository
AAF libraryONAP Nexus repository
AAF API descriptionONAP wiki
AAF Release NotesONAP wiki
AAF DocumentationAAF Git repository

Sub-Components

List all sub-components As part of this release.
Activities related to sub-components must be in sync with the overall release.Sub-components are repositories and are consolidated in a single centralized place. Edit the Release Components name for your project in the centralized page.the Beijing release,Certificate Management will be added to the AAF

Architecture


Architecture

High level architecture diagram

At that stage within the Release, the team is expected to provide more Architecture details describing how the functional modules are interacting.

Indicate where your project fit within the ONAP Archiecture diagram.

Block and sequence diagrams showing relation within the project as well as relation with external components are expected.

Anyone reading this section should have a good understanding of all the interacting modules.

Image Added


Image Added

Platform Maturity

Refering to CII Badging Security Program and Platform Maturity Requirements, fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.

AreaActual LevelTargeted Level for current ReleaseHow, EvidencesComments
Performance01Run performance basic test, depends on performance criteria availability for level 1
  • 0 -- none
  • 1 – baseline performance criteria identified and measured
  • 2 & 3 – performance improvement plans created & implemented
Stability01Participate to Stability runs Level 1
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – 72 hours component level soak w/random transactions
  • 2 – 72 hours platform level soak w/random transactions
  • 3 – 6 months track record of reduced defect rate
Resiliency121
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – manual failure and recovery (< 30 minutes)
  • 2 – automated detection and recovery (single site)
  • 3 – automated detection and recovery (geo redundancy)
Security01Reach CII passing badge, increasing test coverage as remaining item
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – CII Passing badge + 50% Test Coverage
  • 2 – CII Silver badge; internal communication encrypted; role-based access control and authorization for all calls
  • 3 – CII Gold
Scalability01Reach Level 1 single site horizontal scaling
  • 0 – no ability to scale
  • 1 – single site horizontal scaling
  • 2 – geographic scaling
  • 3 – scaling across multiple ONAP instances
Manageability11Using LOG4J common framework for logging
  • 1 – single logging system across components; instantiation in < 1 hour
  • 2 – ability to upgrade a single component; tracing across components; externalized configuration management
Usability11API documentation provided
  • 1 – user guide; deployment documentation; API documentation
  • 2 – UI consistency; usability testing; tutorial documentation

...