Area | Actual Level | Targeted Level for current Release | How, Evidences | Comments |
---|
Performance | 0 | 1 |
| - 0 -- none
- 1 – baseline performance criteria identified and measured
- 2 & 3 – performance improvement plans created & implemented
NOTE: Performance test is not performed in amsterdam though it performent, which is best observed during the usage. so current level is marked 0. In this release, we will add bennchmarking test cases to show the level 1 |
Stability | 0 | 1 |
| - 0 – none
- 1 – 72 hours component level soak w/random transactions
- 2 – 72 hours platform level soak w/random transactions
- 3 – 6 months track record of reduced defect rate
NOTE: Test cases are not added to test the sabiltity and bechmark it. so current level is marked 0. Otherwise, its very stable at level 1 or more. will address the test cases in this release. |
Resiliency | 11 | 2 |
| - 0 – none
- 1 – manual failure and recovery (< 30 minutes)
- 2 – automated detection and recovery (single site)
- 3 – automated detection and recovery (geo redundancy)
|
Security | 0 | 1 |
| - 0 – none
- 1 – CII Passing badge + 50% Test Coverage
- 2 – CII Silver badge; internal communication encrypted; role-based access control and authorization for all calls
- 3 – CII Gold
|
Scalability | 1 | 1 |
| - 0 – no ability to scale
- 1 – single site horizontal scaling
- 2 – geographic scaling
- 3 – scaling across multiple ONAP instances
|
Manageability | 1 | 1 |
| - 1 – single logging system across components; instantiation in < 1 hour
- 2 – ability to upgrade a single component; tracing across components; externalized configuration management
|
Usability | 1 | 2 |
| - 1 – user guide; deployment documentation; API documentation
- 2 – UI consistency; usability testing; tutorial documentation
|