...
Project Name | Project Tech. Lead | Minimum set for Functional Testing | Minimum set for HA / Geo-Redundant Testing | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPU | Mem | Storage | VMs | CPU | Mem | Storage | VMs | Comments | |||
1 | A & AI | 4 | 16G | 40G | 2 | 4 | 16G | 80G | 5/10 | 5 VMs for local H/A (2 for application servers, 3 for cassandra cluster). For geo-redundant config, need 5 in each site | |
2 | Application Authorization Framework | 4 | 8G | 80G | 2 | 4 | 16G | 100G | 2 | ||
3 | APPC | 4 | 8G | 80G | 1 | 4 | 8G | 80G | 5/9 | Per site: 3 app (ODL cluster) /2 DB | |
4 | CLAMP | 2 | 2G | 10G | 2 | 2 | 2G | 10G | 2 | ||
5 | Common Controller SDK | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | As a library/framework, CCSDK doesn't run standalone, so does not need its own VMs | |
6 | DCAE | 10 | 20G | 100G | 2 | 26/54 | 50G/106G | 200G/500G | 13/20 | Note: 1) the mim for functional testing is for the "lab configuration" to be delivered as part of R2; 2) for HA requirements, the first number is w/o CDAP, the 2nd number is with; 3) geo-red can be HA requirements per site | |
7 | DMaaP | 4 | 16G | 100G | 2 | 16 | 32 | 200 | 4 | ||
9 | External API Framework | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA based in Brian F suggestion | |
10 | Holmes | 4 | 2G | 10G | 1 | 4 | 2G | 10G | 2 | ||
12 | Logging Enhancements Project | 4-8 | 8-16G | 80G | 1 | 8-16 | 16-32G | 160G | 2 | ELK stack | |
13 | Microservices Bus | 4 | 16G | 10G | 1 | 4 | 16G | 10G | 2 | ||
14 | Modeling | 4 | 8G | 20G | 3 | 4 | 8G | 20G | 4 | ||
15 | Multi VIM/Cloud | 4 | 16G | 40G | 4 | 4 | 16G | 40G | 4 | ||
16 | ONAP CLI | 1 | 2G | 20G | 1 | 1 | 2G | 20G | 1 | ||
17 | ONAP Operations Manager (OOM) | 6 + 114 + (8 to 32) = 128 - 152 | 12G + 268G + 64G = 354G | 3G + 100G + 120G = 223G | 3 + 29 + 1 = 33 | 16 to 64 | 128G | 240G | 2 | OOM as an ONAP Deployment (like the demo project) (OOM itself is infrastructure undercloud) | |
18 | ONAP Optimization Framework | ||||||||||
19 | Usecase UI | 2 | 2G | 10G | 1 | 2 | 2G | 10G | 2 | ||
20 | Policy Framework | 6 | 16G | 10G | 1 | 6 | 16G | 10G | 2 | ||
21 | Portal Platform | 2 | 8G | 20G | 1 | 2 | 8G | 20G | 2 | ||
22 | SDN-C | 4 | 8G | 80G | 1 | 4 | 8G | 80G | 7/14 | 7 VMs needed for local HA (3 controller tier / OpenDaylight + 2 database tier + 2 web tier). Double that for geo redundancy. | |
23 | Service Design & Creation | 8 | 16G | 100G | 1 | 8 | 16G | 100G | 4/8 | for HA we need 4 VM FE/BE/CS/ES and Double that for geo redundancy. | |
24 | Service Orchestrator | 4 | 8G | 80G | 1 | 4 | 8G | 80G | 2/4 | 2 VMs for local HA (4 for geo distribution, considering 2 replicas) | |
25 | VF-C: Virtual Function Controller | 8 | 16G | 80G | 1 | 8 | 16G | 80G | 2 | ||
26 | VID | 2 | 2G | 10G | 1 | 2 | 2G | 10G | 2 | ||
27 | VNF SDK | 4 | 4G | 80G | 1 | NA (design time component) | |||||
28 | VNF Requirements | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | As documentation directed to VNF Providers, VNFRQTS does not need run time resources | |
29 | VNF Validation (VVP) |