Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Practice AreaCheckpointYes/NoEvidencesHow to?
Product ManagementAre all tasks associated with the release been marked as "Done" in Jira?Yes

Jira Legacy
serverSystem Jira
jqlQueryproject="Policy" and issueType="Task" and fixVersion="Amsterdam Release" and status="Closed" and resolution!="Unresolved"
counttrue
serverId4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176
- These are all the Tasks marked as Closed and Resolved

Jira Legacy
serverSystem Jira
jqlQueryproject="Policy" and issueType="Task" and fixVersion="Amsterdam Release" and (status!="Closed" or resolution="Unresolved")
counttrue
serverId4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176
- These are all the Tasks marked as NOT Closed or Unresolved

10-23 - these 2 issues being displayed will be closed soonThe open issue is documentation. We are enhancing as much as possible.





Have all findings from previous milestones been addressed?YesNo previous findings.
DevelopmentHave all Defects of priority Highest and High been in status "Done" in Jira?Yes

Jira Legacy
serverSystem Jira
jqlQueryproject="Policy" and issueType="Bug" and fixVersion="Amsterdam Release" and priority in ("Highest", "High") and Resolution != "Unresolved" and Status = "Closed"
counttrue
serverId4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176
- These are all the bugs of highest/high priority that are marked as Closed and Resolved

Jira Legacy
serverSystem Jira
jqlQueryproject="Policy" and issueType="Bug" and fixVersion="Amsterdam Release" and priority in ("Highest", "High") and ( Resolution = "Unresolved" or Status != "Closed")
counttrue
serverId4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176
- These are all the bugs of highest/high priority that are NOT marked as Closed or Unresolved



Are all JIRA issues used as a reference in a commit in status "Done" in Jira?Yes
Very often, some JIRA issue remains in status "Todo" in JIRA while the commit they are referenced to is successful.
Is there any pending commit related to Highest and High priority issues older than 36 hours in Gerrit? In case there are messages going back and forth between authors and reviewers, it is acceptable to be above 36 hours.Nohttps://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/q/status:open+projects:policy
Are all the Jenkins jobs successfully passed (verify + merge jobs)?Yes

https://jenkins.onap.org/view/policy/job/policy-common-master-verify-java/

https://jenkins.onap.org/view/policy/job/policy-common-master-merge-java/

https://jenkins.onap.org/view/policy/job/policy-drools-applications-master-verify-java/

https://jenkins.onap.org/view/policy/job/policy-drools-applications-master-merge-java/

https://jenkins.onap.org/view/policy/job/policy-engine-master-verify-java/

https://jenkins.onap.org/view/policy/job/policy-engine-master-merge-java/

https://jenkins.onap.org/view/policy/job/policy-drools-pdp-master-verify-java/

https://jenkins.onap.org/view/policy/job/policy-drools-pdp-master-merge-java/


Has the team delivered all their release artifacts in Nexus Releases repo?

There should be at least ONE version of each artifacts available in Nexus Releases repo.

YesI think you mean Staging repo??All artifacts are in the Staging repository.Refer to Independent Versioning and Release Process for procedure
Integration and TestingHave all CSIT Use Cases (created by each project team) passed?Yeshttps://jenkins.onap.org/view/policy/job/policy-master-csit-health/
Is there a Docker images available for each repository?Yes

Has the project code successfully passed the Daily Build process?Yes
Goal is to ensure the latest project commit has not broken the Integration Daily Build 
Documentation

For RC0, for project delivering binaries, has the team populated and validated all the sections of either the Platform Component or SDK template?


n/a


Most teams have already created the high level file structures in readthedocs, and populated some actual documentation. However, the remaining sections of the appropriate teamplate must be completed.

Platform: A&AI, APP-C, CLAMP, CLI, DCAE, DMaaP, Holmes, MSB, OOM, Policy, Portal, SDN-C SDC, SO, UseCase UI, VFC, VID

SDKs: AAF, CCSDK, External API Framework, Multi VIM/Cloud, VNFSDK

For RC1, has the team addressed any issue (recorded in JIRA) provided by the Documentation team?Yes - none presented

http://onap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submodules/policy/engine.git/docs/index.html

The documentation team has not provided any issues.


For RC2, for project delivering binaries, has the team populated and validated all the sections of the Release Notestemplate?n/a

For RC2, has the Documentation Team provided the final approval for your project documentation?n/a