...
| Practice Area | Checkpoint | Yes/No | Evidence - Comment | How to? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product Management | Are all provisional APIs interface (stub) been defined (at beta-quality level)? | yes | API Documentation | |
| Is there a final list of externally consumable APIs available? | yes | API Documentation | ||
For all completed Sprints, have Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Done" in Jira? | No | Our Sprint finishes 08/04. | Difference between a Product and Sprint Backlog | |
Are all tasks associated with the completed Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Done" in Jira? | No | Target completion 8/4 | ||
| If applicable to your project, has your team been able to clear the project' blockers? If not provide status on the plan to close the blocker(s). | yes | Meeting with SDC on 8/2 | Link to blockers. | |
| Release Management | Have all source code files been updated with License Apache 2 header? | yes | Market place user interface and backend are in vnfsdk/refrepo and are compliant. | Specific rules and instruction are available in ONAP wiki. |
| Has the year format in copyright header of all source code files been updated? (Rules for new files created in 2017 and existing files modified in 2017 are different) | yes | Market place code is migrated from Open-O code and is compliant with these rules. | Guidance on year format | |
| In case source code can't be edited, has a "License.txt" file been placed at the root directory for which the license is applicable? | n/a | Guidance for source code file that can't be edited | ||
| Has the project FOSS Table been updated with latest third party code? | yesProvide link to evidence | VNF-SDK | Your project FOSS table is located under Project FOSS master page | |
| Do you have a plan to address any issue raised by Fossology? | n/a | No issues raised | ||
Have all API projects dependencies been captured? | Provide link to the "API Incoming Dependency" section within your project M1 Release Planning deliverable.yes | VNF SDK Amsterdam Release Planning (M1)#APIIncomingDependencies | The source of information for the API dependency is the "API Incoming Dependency" of the M1 Release Planning deliverable. Please update the source accordingly, and let The Release Manager aware of the changes. | |
| Development | For new projects approved for this release, have all defined repositories source code been placed into Gerrit? | yes | For evidences, provide link(s) to Gerrit repos by providing the URL as shown in this example | |
| Has the project team reach the Automated Unit Test Code Coverage expectation? (Refer to artifacts available in Sonar) | Goal: 30-50% for Incubation project | |||
| Is there any binaries (jar, war, tar, gz, gzip, zip files) in Gerrit project repository? | no | Refer to CI Development Best Practices | ||
| Could you ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, company name, etc. have been removed? All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols. | yes | OPEN-O files were previously scanned; VES flies | ||
| Is there any pending commit request older than 36 business hours in Gerrit? | no | |||
| Have all the Jenkins jobs successfully passed (Merge-Jobs)? | Provide link as evidence to Jenkins project tab | |||
| Are all snapshot binaries available in Nexus? | Provide link to evidence in Nexus project folder | |||
| Integration and Testing | Have functional test cases been documented in wiki? | Provide link to evidence | ||
| Have you implemented in Jenkins at least 1 functional test case for each of the project repository? | As an evidence, provide a link to Jenkins (CSIT Jobs) that shows a sample test case implemented (1 job for each repo). | As an example (provided by Integration Team) | ||
| Has the project code successfully passed the Build process? | Goal is to ensure your project latest commits have not broken the build. | |||
| Documentation | Has the team identified and outlined the set of documentations to be delivered in this Release? | yes | Documentation Outline |