We start our meetings by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.
Agenda
START RECORDING
Duration | Agenda Item | Requested by | Notes / Links | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30 mins | Cross-project discussion |
| ||||||||
CLM Jenkins jobs are failing |
| |||||||||
New Delhi Oslo Release Status |
| |||||||||
Oslo | For Oslo plan,
| |||||||||
Oslo |
| |||||||||
Project Maturity | Byung-Woo Jun | ONAP component mature state, Mature State Projects Now, we are handling ONAP component individually under ONAP Streamlining, exposing the components to users. CPS is the first case that TSC approved the mature state after ONAP Streamlining. Should we keep the projects under the list as "mature", or should we certify them again? Several components are deprecated. According to TSC 2.0 doc, Mature state is "Project is fully functioning and stable, has achieved successful releases." Several projects in the list are deprecated/archived. To approach a broad audience, should we consider the "Core" state for some selected projects?? Gold badging is a separate process from the project maturity in LFN?
| ||||||||
LF IT Support |
Pending tikect opened by Marek: https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/desk/portal/2/IT-25573
Thomas Kulik - issues with Portal-NG and other documentation - IT-26899 Project is not created in RTD Ticket opened by Tony: IT-26848 | |||||||||
Open Source Security | Byung-Woo Jun | CISA report on memory safe code: joint-guidance-exploring-memory-safety-in-critical-open-source-projects-508c.pdf | ||||||||
Testing Environment | ||||||||||
Testing Improvement | ||||||||||
CSIT Review | ||||||||||
ToolChain Improvement | ||||||||||
Documentation | ||||||||||
Other Improvement suggestion | Plan to migrate ONAP components to use RFC8040.
---- As backup Dan is working on Biermann but not progressed. ODL is not supporting it. Restconf stack is based on RFC draft.
As we have no solution, we can not move to ODL Potasium. | |||||||||
Subcommittee Updates for PTLs |
- no solution for now:
Ticket opened by Fiete: https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/desk/portal/2/IT-26527 (ticket is closed)
We are missing NG Portal UI CLM job. List of the ONAP components to be disabled prepared by Andreas: On April 18th, TSC approved the list. Ticket opened by Fiete fir UI CLM scan: https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/desk/portal/2/IT-26882 - not a maven based project - an issue? To be further eleborated with Jess. | |||||||||
Sharing Best Practices | ||||||||||
Others | ||||||||||
IF TIME ALLOWS .... | ||||||||||
15 mins | Release status | |||||||||
5 mins | Upcoming Events |
| ||||||||
10 mins | Remaining Action Items |
...