Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

BRIDGE: https://zoom.us/j/661303200?pwd=TFdRd0c2MTJUem8xa252UGJHTE1Mdz09

Passcode: 209247

We will start our meetings by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.

AttendedProxy (w/ @name)HolidayDid Not Attend

...


Agenda Items

Presented By

Presos/Notes/Links/



Strategy (45 minutes)

ONAP takeaways


We are encouraging ONAP consumers to share with us their feedback, so we could prioritize our activities and make ONAP better suited their needs and requirements.

LFN Cross-Organization Updates

MAC, SPC, TAC, EUAG, LFN Board

Introducing Marek Szwalkiewicz - candidate for INT PTL

#AGREED:  Does the TSC approve Marek Szwalkiewicz as the PTL for the INT project?


Announcement - Kevin Tang will be joining the TSC call next week (April 13) to provide an update on the Network Slicing use case


TCC / ONAP Liaison Updates



Task Force Updates

Proposed new Mission statement

  • ONAP mission statement_v2.pdf
  • More discussion?
  • Plan:  share with the TAC and solicit feedback
  • Comment from Magnus Buhrgard (Unlicensed) :  

    I have got some feedback on the new “P” in ONAP. Some people don’t think program is good.

    Other proposals: Partnership, Process, Potential, Prospect, Project.

    Maybe we should ask TAC and MAC for their opinion.

  •  David McBride submit legal Jira to get feedback on any legal issues with using the word, "Partnership" in the ONAP acronym


#VOTE:  does the TSC approve sharing the proposed new ONAP mission statement with the TAC?

Vote deferred to next week

There's some interest in the TSC with using "Program".  Discuss with Magnus next week about what the specific objections were.

How about "Provisioning"?

Stacked rank survey:  partnership, process, potential, prospect, project, provisioning

Plan:

  1. Wait one week to get feedback from Magnus
  2. Consider sending a stacked rank poll to the TSC to identify the new acronym

Shankar:  include in the poll a question about whether TSC members agree or disagree with the new mission statement.

Shankar:  Third sentence should include "management".  Magnus agreed to this last week.

  •  David McBride check with Magnus on revision to mission statement proposal that includes "management" in the third sentence
Operations (40 minutes)


TSC Activities and Deadlines



Release Status

Weekly Status Report


London release status

  • Schedule
    • Last week, the TSC approved moving the remainder of the release schedule out one week, beginning with M3.
    • M3 was rescheduled for today, April 6
  • Milestone Status
    • M3
    • Recommendation: approve M3

#AGREED:  Does the TSC approve that the requirements for the London M3 milestone have been met, with the exception of AAI, OOF, and DCAE?


Montreal release

Plan for a vote on April 20, after the ONAP / ODL sync meeting.

RelEng/Infrastructure

Update on enabling SBOM

--

Update global-jjb: unpin tox version and remove tox-pyenv

Breakage related to whitelist_externals → allowlist_externals

PTL Updates



Subcommittee Updates

Arch, Lab, Modeling, Seccom, Requirements



Events & Meetings

(5 minutes)

Upcoming Events & Housekeeping

PTL meeting on Monday, April 10, is canceled due to the Easter Monday holiday in Europe


Release name nominations

  • Nominations are open until April 13   
  • Please add your favorite city name here.


Pawel asks about Kohn awards.  Kenny is working on it.  Vote will be available soon.

...