Versions Compared

Old Version 5

changes.mady.by.user David McBride

Saved on

compared with

New Version 6

changes.mady.by.user Magnus Buhrgard (Unlicensed)

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

BRIDGE: https://zoom.us/j/661303200?pwd=TFdRd0c2MTJUem8xa252UGJHTE1Mdz09

Passcode: 209247

2022 TSC Recordings

2022 TSC Decisions

Anti-Trust Policy

We will start our meetings by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.

AttendedProxy (w/ @name)Gov. HolidayDid Not Attend

...

Agenda Items

Presented By

Presos/Notes/Links/

Release Status

David McBride

Weekly Status Report

Jakarta release

Kohn Release

RelEng/Infrastructure

Jessica Gonzalez

  • Tickets- Open showstoppers:
  • Tickets- Waiting on Community:
  • Migration Status / Upcoming Changes

PTL Updates

Sylvain Desbureaux 

OOM Gitlab Readout

Subcommittee Updates

Arch, Lab, Modeling, Seccom, Requirements



LFN Cross-Organization Updates

MAC, SPC, TAC, EUAG, LFN Board



TCC / ONAP Liaison Updates

Magnus Buhrgard (Unlicensed) 
  1. Liaison statement to 3GPP regarding IPR, for approval

View file
nameONAP LS to 3GPP.pdf
height150

Positive answer Reply to ONAP's questions received from 3GPP legal:
"The right use of the 3GPP terminology/names in ONAP’s projects (independently from using 3GPP code or specifications) => concerning this point, it is possible to use the same terminology (this alone shall have no legal incidence) ;  and it is indeed relevant to reinforce the use of 3GPP standards."(ETSI) legal

View file
nameReply from 3GPP (ETSI) Legal.pdf
height150

I propose to go through with the LS in order to get an official answer from 3GPP.

2. ONAP - TM Forum meeting on Intent based automation - 6th April

3. Presentation in TM Forum’s Multi-SDO Autonomous Networks meeting series (May timeframetime frame)

  • I propose to re-use presentation(s) from DTF in January. Other suggestions are of course welcome.

Task Force Updates
CNF, Wiki 2.0, ONAP Enterprise



TSC Activities and Deadlines

cl664y@att.com


Upcoming Events & Housekeeping

Kenny Paul


<Available Slot>



...