David McBride

Jessica Gonzalez

Michał Jagiełło 

• Where do we move 3GPP VES specification ownership? Options to host '3GPP VES specification' :
  • Modeling project - modeling-etsicatalog; https://gerrit.onap.org/r/admin/repos/q/filter:modeling
  • DCAE project
• E-mail sent to the ONAP Modeling Subcommittee - VES Specifications
• Thank you to the Modeling Subcommunity to take it over
• Magnus Buhrgard (Unlicensed) 3GPP won't pick up any thing new related to the VES spec - will stick to the reference they have already taken from ONAP
• N.K. Shankaranarayanan some discussion needed coming out of ORAN discussions which includes aspects of licensing / IPR
• Investigate how we can move existing repo under Modeling or leave as active in VNFRQTS - 
  https://gerrit.onap.org/r/admin/repos/vnfrqts/requirements,branches
• Magnus notes that the path must remain intact - cannot change.
•  #AGREED all Committers and rights currently assigned to the Modeling repo will also be applied to the VNFRQTS/requirements Repo. - all other VNFRQTS repos to be moved to read only.

Magnus Buhrgard (Unlicensed) 

• Application Service Descriptor (ASD) - model approval

• ASD  is a simplified (Compared to ETSI-NFV SOL001) method for Cloud Native Network Function (CNF) description.
• A PoC implementation is being developed as part of Jakarta.
• This work is related to the CNFF Taskforce report presented  by Byung-Woo Jun and Fernando Oliveira during the last TSC meeting.
• There was a poll to approve the ASD spec in the modeling subcommittee.  There was one "no" vote, stating the need  for ETSI-NFV alignment. However, by definition the ASD is different from ETSI-NFV specification.
• cl664y@att.com- What is the plan long term? Keep two alternatives (ETSI and ASD), or merge them? Byung-Woo Jun - ASD is an additional path to the ETSI-aligned-orchestration.  Fernando Oliveira - There is a planned meeting between ONAP ASD creators and ETSI-NFV workgroup to figure out if the two approaches may be reconciled.
• The team working on ASD implementation would like to have a clear "go" from the modeling subcommittee so they can continue  integration with SDC and other ONAP modules.
• Kenny Paul - Unclear how a three-participant poll determined the decision of the modeling subcommittee
• Eric Debeau - Concerned about  creating two alternative orchestration approaches.
• Thinh Nguyenphu (Unlicensed) - Re: Joint workshop with ETSI NFV on ASD proposal (onap.org) 

We are lacking Thomas Kulik

• Recommend adding a new section to the docs, maybe https://docs.onap.org/en/latest/guides/onap-operator/settingup/index.html
• Installation how-to video would be helpful
• Prior contract work was focused on vFW use came primarily. and a bit out of date now.
• Installation via OOM:
  • https://docs.onap.org/projects/onap-oom/en/latest/oom_cloud_setup_guide.html#oom-cloud-setup-guide
  • https://docs.onap.org/projects/onap-oom/en/latest/oom_quickstart_guide.html#oom-quickstart-guide
• vFW Use Case: https://docs.onap.org/projects/onap-integration/en/latest/docs_vFW_CNF_CDS.html#docs-vfw-cnf-cds

Wiki 2.0 - Call for Volunteers

Thank you Chaker Al-Hakim , Ranny Haiby , Timo Perala to be part of it as participant

Need a lead for this task force

cl664y@att.com

• ONAP Community Awards: Istanbul Release - nominations open through 14 Feb 2022
• 2022 ONAP Priorities / Action Plan - next week
• TSC 2.0 - Project Life Cycle: 
  •  2021 Project Lifecycle Proposed Edits - tight to the Unmaintained project discussions - see action items from TSC 2021-12-09
    • Weekly meeting on Monday  (let David McBride know if you'd like to be added to the invitation)
• LFN Board follow-up actions -no update this week
• Prepare TM Forum presentation (April 11th, 2022) 

Kenny Paul