Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

zoom bridge: https://zoom.us/j/283628617

...

Duration

Agenda Item

Requested byNotes / Links
START RECORDING
10minEl Alto approved projectscl664y@att.com

21 approved, 3 conditional, 2 content to be reviewed, 2 unplanned

Feedback on M1 Jira structures cloned into the projects? Project Status in El-Alto Release

El-Alto Timeline Clarifications

  • Early Drop (ED): content is DEV1 certified by TEST1

     Container to be delivered to Integration Team by July 29th, 2019

  • El-Alto Final Release (EA): content of DEV2/DEV3 certified by TEST2/TEST3

Spreadsheet Timeline to add these clarifications.

20minDublin Retrospectivecl664y@att.comDublin Retrospective (continued - gather more items, prioritize list, assign owners)
15min

El Alto integration testing proposal review

<Add Yang's slides>

10 minsLogging/POMBA discussions
5minIncredible Disappearing DeploymentJonathan Gathman
10minVulnerability Review Table update
5minCII Badging Progresshttp://tlhansen.us/onap/cii.html
10minAction items reviewcl664y@att.comAction Items review: PTL Weekly ONAP12, Mon UTC 13:00

Event reminder


ONS Joint Sub committee meetings - Sept 26&27 Antwerp
5 minJIRA priority definitionsSteven wright
  1. The definitions of priority in JIRA https://jira.onap.org/plugins/servlet/project-config/VNFRQTS/priorities do not match the definitions of priority in the Wiki https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Tracking+Issues+with+JIRA#TrackingIssueswithJIRA-JIRAPriorityDefinitionforBugs. It would be good to have them in sync.
  2. Neither of those definitions mentions documentation. I prefer the more verbose definitions on the Wiki, but would like to see some mention of how to prioritize documentation. I would expect documentation tickets should never get higher than a medium priority – but it would be good to have agreement on that from PTLs/ TSC.
5minPublic/Private access via Locator


Zoom Chat Log 
Anchor
chat
chat

...