Versions Compared

Old Version 5

changes.mady.by.user Former user

Saved on

compared with

New Version 6

changes.mady.by.user Steven wright

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Duration

Agenda Item

Requested byNotes / Links
START RECORDING
30min

El Alto testing proposal review

Yang Xu


20minDublin Retrospectivecl664y@att.comDublin Retrospective (continued - gather more items, prioritize list, assign owners)
5minIncredible Disappearing DeploymentJonathan Gathman
5minVulnerability Review Table update

Amy Zwarico

Paweł Pawlak


5minCII Badging Progress

Tony Hansen

Paweł Pawlak Amy Zwarico

http://tlhansen.us/onap/cii.html
5min

Resource capping in test labs

Testing environments

Yang Xu


10min
cl664y@att.comAction Items review: PTL Weekly ONAP12, Mon UTC 13:00



ONS Joint Sub committee meetings - Sept 26&27 Antwerp
5 minJIRA priority definitionsSteven wright
  1. The definitions of priority in JIRA https://jira.onap.org/plugins/servlet/project-config/VNFRQTS/priorities do not match the definitions of priority in the Wiki https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Tracking+Issues+with+JIRA#TrackingIssueswithJIRA-JIRAPriorityDefinitionforBugs. It would be good to have them in sync.
  2. Neither of those definitions mentions documentation. I prefer the more verbose definitions on the Wiki, but would like to see some mention of how to prioritize documentation. I would expect documentation tickets should never get higher than a medium priority – but it would be good to have agreement on that from PTLs/ TSC.


Zoom Chat Log 
Anchor
chat
chat

...