...
- (TSC) Finalize discussions about the Infrastructure Role
- (Owners/PTLs) Close the actions captured on the Dublin Requirements wiki
- (Jim): Provide Finalize POC Definition to be reviewed approved by TSC
- (Amy Zwarico): Security by design - work with the PTLs on missing JIRA vulnerability issues
- (TSC): Create a Task force to work on the ONAP component dependency
- (TSC): To review project maturity (incubation, etc.)
- (TSC ): To send Integration/Pair-wise testing proposal again
- (TSC & Modeling Chairs): Finalize Dublin M2-M4 Modeling Checklist Review
- (TSC & Security Subcommittee): Finalize Dublin M2-M4 Security Checklist Review
- (SECCOM): Collect feedback from PTLS concernig running dockers as non-root prior the next PTL Call (2/11)
- (Michael O'Brien): Remind PTLs about the wiki page where we are consolidating the external port list - OOM NodePort List
- (Jason): Upgrade path not committed; work with PTLs to define the strict minimum?
- (SECCOM): Footprint Optimization - is there any recommendation/concern from SECCOM?
- (Footprint Optimization Task Force): Define clear strategy - can Alpine be optional? The current strategy is that the Integration Team will use the Alpine for the Dublin Certification - how shall we move forward based on today's feedback?
https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/4605 - (TSC): Kick-off discussions to change the ONAP SW Delivery Model for the next releases i.e. El-Alto
...