...
Duration | Agenda Item | Requested by | Notes / Links | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
START RECORDING | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Casablanca Maintenance Release
| Remaining Open Issues: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-release/message/935 Casablanca Maintenance Manifest: https://gerrit.onap.org/r/gitweb?p=integration.git;a=blob_plain;f=version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv;hb=refs/heads/casablanca New Docker Image - Component
Integration Status: AAI Healcheck - issue raised this morning (AAI-2026); need to retry since OOM not yet reviewed so it could be related to ... Remaining Docker Image (Yellow & Blue items) to be delivered no later than Jan 16th, 2019 Release note: Follow-up offline with Sofia | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dublin Release - M1 preparation S3P Requirements Security pNF/xNF | TSC Dublin Release Prioritization (v11): Dublin Release Requirements Feedback/Action items: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/4460 Remaining Open Issues: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-release/message/934 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Review of previous action items | Helm Chart Transfer: 4 projects have been identified for trial: Log, Policy, APPC and Clamp. Mike Elliott will work with PTL to gather/transfer knowledge and create training materials. Training to be done the week of Jan 14 and PTL to provide their commitment or not by M1 on Jan 17. <1-7/2019>: Work in progress. Schedule might shift to another week. Michael will follow-up with Mike. Training will be open to everybody. The objective is that each team will take over the management of their Helm Charts. K8S: Yang Xu Ensure labs are updated to relevant K8S version <1-7/2019>: Ongoing. K8s 1.11.5; Rancher 2.0 - parameters set in the Heat template to bring the VMs related to K8S. <01/13/2019> From Integration, here are the related versions: docker_version: rancher_version: rancher_agent_version: kubectl_version: helm_version: and secondary here https://git.onap.org/logging-analytics/tree/deploy - under https://jira.onap.org/browse/OOM-1496 https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Security+Space+Wiki+Access+ListOom values.yaml or integration repo manifest ( TSC-86 - Lock down docker image tag name source of truth - oom values.yaml or integration repo manifest - A: both but manifest is the source Submitted ) if not covered - see TSC 2019-01-10 Quick discussion on nailing down whether we need a yaml override of the deployable docker image tags in the oom repo (understanding is no) - with the integration docker manifest (manifest is currently a copy of the oom values.yaml tags - not the reverse) If not - then we need a documented procedure wiki/RTD on running a derived values.yaml override for the entire system before deployment AAF is only an example here https://git.onap.org/oom/tree/kubernetes/aaf/charts/aaf-service/values.yaml?h=casablanca#n28 image: onap/aaf/aaf_service:2.1.8 drives onap/aaf/aaf_service,2.1.8<1-7/2019> Integration team to document the procedure. <01/13/2019> Answer from Integration team: docker manifest under integration repo is the source of truth, and is used by Integration team to override OOM values.yaml when deploying ONAP in Openlab. See the instructions at the bottom of page https://onap.readthedocs.io/en/casablanca/submodules/integration.git/docs/onap-oom-heat.html#onap-oom-heat-template 15min | Integration team CI demo | Integration team had developed integration CI during Casablanca, and it had been used by release manager to report progress. We will demonstrate its basic features in this meeting to collect feedback. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Offline Review | WindRiver Lab Management | Please review the Windriver information sent by Stephen Gooch Rules:
Lab Strategy to be established | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 min | DEV reduced deployment footprint through ReplicaSet: 1 | Michael O'Brien | Continue dev.yaml adjustment for ReplicSet: 1 This reduction of 20+ containers is easier - just need a signoff on several PTLs that the remaining clusters actually run with 1 instance enough for dev. DEV environment deployment footprint reduction by reducing remaining ReplicaSet clusters to 1 from 2/3/5/7 - only in dev.yaml override
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 min | K8S Deployment Dependencies - enforcement through conditional (see AAI) | Discussion on state of enforced dependencies - SDNC and AAI are good examples - for SDNC it will not deploy unless dmaap, consul and sdc are pre-deployed, however other projects that have compile-time/injection-time pom.xml dependencies are not reflected. Some projects have explicit deployments set in their init containers - others do not yet. Issues: Enforced dependencies block a module for dev testing unless dependencies are up For example - everyone needs AAI up - but there are no init containers referencing AAI so any module can deploy without AAI - but functionality will be limited. Proposal: Follow - as usual - AAI example - where they put in a conditional on the --set enabled flag - and don't enforce the dependency - not blocking bringing up just a single module. However if the dependency is enabled in dev/values.yaml then the dependency is checked. https://git.onap.org/oom/tree/kubernetes/aai/charts/aai-traversal/templates/job.yaml#n42
The deployment profile is useful for module-level deployments, consistent sequential deployments, CD and dev environments current state or higher level
| Any Help-desk ticket in the queue? | Committer, Calendar, etc? #1 DmaaP zoom bridge issue #2 AAF - Add Sai committer's rights #3 Remove inactive Modeling committers - https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/4450 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Offline Review | ticket in from 11/30 to change meeting time | Steven wright | I've been trying to change meeting time for VNFRQTS call since Nov last year. Process on website says to create ticket on helpdesk. I've have no response on this. If that's not the process can we get the instructions updated. Helpdesk #'s #66481 #65633 #64787 |
...